UC - willful misconduct - offensive language - de minimus conduct - provocation
Campbell v. UCBR – Cmwlth. Court – February 17, 2015 – unpublished memorandum opinion
One-time us of the word “bitch” toward a co-worker, in response to that employee’s threatening outburst, was de minimus and not disqualifying willful misconduct, even though use of abusive language violated ER rule.
Arnold v. UCBR, 703 A.2d 582 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1997), “offensive language directed by an employee to an employer, if sufficiently provoked or de minimis, will not constitute willful misconduct.” Id. at 584. Horace W. Longacre, Inc. v. UCBR, 316 A.2d 110 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1974), and Kowal v. UCBR, 512 A.2d 812 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1986). Perez v. UCBR, 736 A.2d 737 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1999)
If the case is not recent, the link in this posting may not work. In that case, search for the case by name and date on Westlaw, Lexis, Google Scholar, or the court website http://www.pacourts.us/courts/supreme-court/court-opinions/
The opinion, though not reported, may be cited "for its persuasive value, but not as binding precedent." 210 Pa. Code 69.414.