Dunbar v. Pennsylvania State Police
http://tinyurl.com/lvygk
The Pennsylvania State Police -- not the Department of Corrections -- are the proper party defendant in challenges the accuracy of criminal history record, pursuant to 18 Pa. CS 9151, part of the Criminal History Record Information Act, 18 Pa. CS 9101 - 9183.
Monday, July 10, 2006
UC - available for work - alien worker - expired work authorization
Jimoh v. UCBR - Commonwealth Court - July 6, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/opvpg
UC claimant's arguments in his brief were waived where they were not included in his Petition for Review.
In n. 7, the court said in dictum that the claimant would not have prevailed even if the court had considered the issues which he had waived. Claimant was an alien worker whose work authorization had expired. The court said that under such circumstances, he was not available for work under sec. 401(d) of the UC Law, 43 PS 801(d).
http://tinyurl.com/opvpg
UC claimant's arguments in his brief were waived where they were not included in his Petition for Review.
In n. 7, the court said in dictum that the claimant would not have prevailed even if the court had considered the issues which he had waived. Claimant was an alien worker whose work authorization had expired. The court said that under such circumstances, he was not available for work under sec. 401(d) of the UC Law, 43 PS 801(d).
admin. law - appeal - petition for review - issues - waiver
Jimoh v. UCBR - Commonwealth Court - July 6, 2006
http://tinyurl.com/opvpg
UC claimant's arguments in his brief were waived where they were not included in his Petition for Review.
http://tinyurl.com/opvpg
UC claimant's arguments in his brief were waived where they were not included in his Petition for Review.
Pennsylvania Bulletin of July 8, 2006
The link:
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/index.html
recent statutes
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/1259.html
proposed rules - judgments - execution/attachment-exempt property
comments due Aug. 31, 2006 This proposed rule would prevent attachment of exempt monies - including social security, veterans benefits, various pensions, etc -- which have been electronically deposited into bank accounts
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/1261.html
welfare - licensure/approval appeal procedure www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/1268.html
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/index.html
recent statutes
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/1259.html
proposed rules - judgments - execution/attachment-exempt property
comments due Aug. 31, 2006 This proposed rule would prevent attachment of exempt monies - including social security, veterans benefits, various pensions, etc -- which have been electronically deposited into bank accounts
www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/1261.html
welfare - licensure/approval appeal procedure www.pabulletin.com/secure/data/vol36/36-27/1268.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)