bankruptcy - mobile home - ch. 13 - cram down - realty v. personalty - valuation
Nowlin v. Tammac Corporation - ED Pa. - October 17, 2005
Nowlin filed a chapter 13 bankruptcy case and brought an adversary action against the secured holder of her installment loan contract, seeking a cram down its claim to the actual value of her mobile home. The bankruptcy court held that
a) the mobile home was personalty, not realty;
b) the value was $38,000, compared to principal balance at time of trial of $41, 368.28;
c) interest of 8% should apply to the creditor's claim, as opposed to the contract rate of 12.5%.
Nowlin appealed the valuation, which she thought should be lower, as well as the 8% interest rate. The creditor appealed the ruling that the home was personality and not realty.
The district court held that
a) the home was personalty, in the bankruptcy context (detailed discussion of this issue) - This determination allowed the court to bifurcate the creditor's claim into secured and unsecured elements, based on fair market value.
b) the valuation of $38,000 was not clearly erroneous -- somewhere between the $ figures provided by the parties' experts.
c) 8% was the appropriate interest rate to be applied to the crammed down claim, under a
"formula approach" - national prime rate, adjusted according to risk factors.
MidPenn Legal Services