Moran v. UCBR - Cmwlth. Cour - Ap[ril 27, 2009
http://origin-www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Cwealth/out/1659CD08_4-27-09.pdf
The court rejected claimant's argument that his failure to put the brake on his truck was merely negligence, under Navickas v. UCBR, 787 A.2d 284 (Pa. 2001), since claimant was fired not for a negligent error but rather for the violation of the work rule regarding putting the brake on trucks.
Tuesday, April 28, 2009
UC - appeal -proof of mailing - postage meter
Moran v. UCBR - Cmwlth. Cour - Ap[ril 27, 2009
http://origin-www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Cwealth/out/1659CD08_4-27-09.pdf
Employer's appeal was timely filed, where the date on the emvelope, from the the employer's postage meter, was within the appeal period, upholding the validity of 34 Pa. Code 101.82 and distinguishing Lin v. UCBR, 735 A.2d 697 (Pa. 1999), a pre-regulation decision.
http://origin-www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Cwealth/out/1659CD08_4-27-09.pdf
Employer's appeal was timely filed, where the date on the emvelope, from the the employer's postage meter, was within the appeal period, upholding the validity of 34 Pa. Code 101.82 and distinguishing Lin v. UCBR, 735 A.2d 697 (Pa. 1999), a pre-regulation decision.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)