Thursday, February 19, 2009

UC - subpoena - standard for granting

Alston v. UCBR - Cmwlth. Court - February 19, 2009

http://origin-www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Cwealth/out/1769CD07_2-19-09.pdf

The court reversed the UCBR decision on the merits and remanded the case for a hearing with claimant witnesses whom the referee improperly refused to subpoena.

The court rejected the Board's claim that the witnesses' evidence would be "directly contradictory" to that of the employer and held that it need only lead to "relevant and provative evidence," citing Hamilton v. UCBR, 532 A.2d A.2d 535, 537 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987).

UC - appeal letter - pro se litigant

Alston v. UCBR - Cmwlth. Court - February 19, 2009

http://origin-www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Cwealth/out/1769CD07_2-19-09.pdf

A letter to the court served as an appeal under Pa. RAP 1514(a) and sec. 67.13 of court internal operating procedure, which gives a pro se claimant 30 days from receipt of timely appeal letter in which to file a proper petition for review.

>