Reading Water Authority v. UCBR –
Cmwlth. Court – April 21, 2016
Held:
Where a claimant is fired for a criminal act, such as theft, subsequent
acceptance into an ARD program is not sufficient proof of willful
misconduct. Bruce v. UCBR, 2 A.3d 667
(Pa. Cmwlth), app. denied, 12 A.3D 753 (Pa. 2010); UCBR v. Vereen, 379 A.2d 1228
(Pa. Cmwlt. 1977).
-----------------
If the case is old, the link
may have become stale and may not work, but you can use the case name, court,
and date to find the opinion in another source (e.g., Westlaw, Lexis, Google
Scholar)
